![]() According to me, the velocity and frequency of sound waves decrease as they propagate through the medium just like the case with water waves. For example they swear that sound waves in air travel at a constant velocity of about 330meters/sec and believe that sound frequency remains the same even farther away from the source (of course, when there is no relative motion between the source, medium and observer). But actually your physics prophets don’t agree with you. So you argue that my above explanation for red shift holds true only for mechanical waves that move through a medium and not for your magical EM waves. That exposes the double standards of your relativity believers. But when I use water waves analogy to explain the red shift, you suddenly start arguing that I am comparing apples with pears. When your prophets use water waves analogy to confirm the wave like behavior of light in double slit experiment, your religious crowd never say that comparing water with light is like comparing apples with pears. It looks like your religious preoccupation didn’t allow you to see all that but rather forced you to give a knee jerk response. And through out this blog, I have talked about all that and exposed how the prophets of modern physics misinterpreted various experiments and wrongly disproved Ether. But for rational minds, light waves are nothing but oscillations of ether medium and are not any more mysterious or magical than other type of waves. I am aware that according to the religion of relativity, light waves or EM waves travel through space without the need for any medium in some mysterious way (which you have explained in crystal clear terms!). Maybe none of them are competent enough to do this? Most theoretical physicists cannot even do this. To understand a light-wave one must be competent enough to solve Maxwell’s equations in the correct manner. I wish people would stop comparing light-waves to other waves that move through a medium and then claim that they have found a mistake in physics. Its energy is totally static: Such a trapped light-wave has no kinetic energy and its temperature is thus absolute zero! The energy of a light-wave is thus NOT within a medium but within the wave itself.įor this reason a trapped light-wave in a perfectly reflecting cavity does not undulate like a wave within a medium. This is not the case for a light-wave since it moves by means of induction-forces. Waves in a pond move within a medium within which potential-energy changes into kinetic energy and kinetic energy into potential energy at each point in the medium through which the wave moves. This argument is irrelevant since it compares apples to pears. Wave mechanics is probably the most messed up topic in the entire discipline of physics and that mess-up has what helped the absurd theories of modern physics to flourish in the religious scientific circles. ![]() In fact, not only the frequency, but also the velocity and the amplitude of the waves would decrease as waves propagate father and farther from the source. As I have elaborated elsewhere, it is the amplitude (along with frequency) which actually determines a wave’s velocity and not the wavelength. ![]() ![]() So unlike what our physics prophets preach, red shift isn’t a proof of a receding source, rather it is a natural phenomenon that occurs as waves propagate in space/medium. In other words, it is n’t because of the Doppler effect. That is, the farther the observer from the source, the lesser the frequency one measures for the same waves.Īnd this drop in frequency would occur even when the source and the medium (water) are stationary. ![]() And the frequency measured by the second observer would be even lesser. The frequency measured by the first observer would be less than the frequency of oscillation of the paddle. Move a paddle to and fro at a frequency of 10/minute and generate a continuous train of waves in a large pond of still water.Īsk an observer standing in the pond about 5meters away from the source to measure the frequency of the water waves as the waves hit him.Īsk a second observer standing in the pond, say about 20 meters farther from the source, to measure the frequency of the same waves as the waves cross him. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |